>EN-LAWOFFICE>Cases>Trademark Cases
Newest
Trademark
Patent
Copyright
Unfair Competition
Unitalen Client NucTech Won in a Retrial Case08-30
In March 2017, NucTech filed a lawsuit of trademark infringement and unfair competition against Taihong Vision in the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, claiming that Taihong Vision used marks containing "威视(Weishi)" on security inspection equipment and official websites...
Damages of 10 Million Yuan Awarded by the Court! 10-year Trademark Dispute between...08-30
In January 2001, Pigeon Company was established, and the company name has been in use ever since. Pigeon Company has made extensive publicity and promotion of the Pigeon brand and has won many honors and huge revenue...
A Former Distributor was Ordered to Pay Compensation of RMB 800,000 for Software...08-04
Kingdee is a well-known business management software provider, leading the industry with strong technical strength. The software KIS and software K/3 developed by Kingdee for enterprises of different sizes are well received by the market...
Unitalen Client Visa Association Won the Litigation to Protect Its Trademark "VISA"...06-30
The disputed trademark application, application No. 3395922 was applied for registration on goods "Plum wine, Liqueur, Rice alcohol, Liqueurs, Cider, Sparkling wine, Whisky, Wujiapi wine, Wine, Sake, Baijiu" and the like in Class 33 on December 6, 2002 by BOHAE BREWERY CO., LTD...
The Cross-Class Similarity Determination of Trademarks for Lubricating Oil and...06-30
Huai'an Hairun Petrochemical Co. Ltd. (Hairun Company) applied for registration of the disputed trademark on goods "Industrial oil; Motor oil; Emulsifying oil; White oil; Solvent oil; Lubricating oil; and Fuel oil" and the like in Class 4, on June 6, 2005, and was approved on November 14, 2008...
Unitalen Client Won Retrial by the Supreme People’s Court in Trademark Use Disputes04-30
In 2015, our client Ping-An-Ye Group filed with the Trademark Office for reexamination of revoking No. 3382610 “赛林娜” trademark (hereinafter referred to as the “disputed trademark”) due to three consecutive years of non-use, which was supported by the then Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) with the decision to revoke the disputed trademark (hereinafter referred to as the “disputed decision”)...